Abstract
Does the soul have parts? What kind of parts? And how do all the parts make together a whole? Many ancient, medieval and early modern philosophers discussed these questions, thus providing a mereological analysis of the soul. Their starting point was a simple observation: we tend to describe the soul of human beings by referring to different types of activities (perceiving, imagining, thinking, etc.). Each type of activity seems to be produced by a special part of the soul. But how can a simple, undivided soul have parts? Classical thinkers gave radically different answers to this question. While some claimed that there are indeed parts, thus assigning an internal complexity to the soul, others emphasized that there can only be a plurality of functions that should not be conflated with a plurality of parts. The eleven chapters reconstruct and critically examine these answers. They make clear that the metaphysical structure of the soul was a crucial issue for ancient, medieval and early modern philosophers.
Content
1–14 | Klaus Corcilius and Dominik Perler, "Introduction", in: Klaus Corcilius and Dominik Perler (Eds.), Partitioning the Soul. Debates from Plato to Leibniz, Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter, 2014, 1–14 |
15–38 | Christopher Shields, "Plato's Divided Soul", in: Klaus Corcilius and Dominik Perler (Eds.), Partitioning the Soul. Debates from Plato to Leibniz, Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter, 2014, 15–38 |
39–62 | Thomas K. Johansen, "Parts in Aristotle’s Definition of Soul: De Anima Books I and II", in: Klaus Corcilius and Dominik Perler (Eds.), Partitioning the Soul. Debates from Plato to Leibniz, Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter, 2014, 39–62 |
63–84 | Brad Inwood, "Walking and Talking: Reflections on Divisions of the Soul in Stoicism", in: Klaus Corcilius and Dominik Perler (Eds.), Partitioning the Soul. Debates from Plato to Leibniz, Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter, 2014, 63–84 |
85–106 | Robert J. Hankinson, "Partitioning the Soul: Galen on the Anatomy of the Psychic Functions and Mental Illness", in: Klaus Corcilius and Dominik Perler (Eds.), Partitioning the Soul. Debates from Plato to Leibniz, Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter, 2014, 85–106 |
107–148 | Filip Karfík, "Parts of the Soul in Plotinus", in: Klaus Corcilius and Dominik Perler (Eds.), Partitioning the Soul. Debates from Plato to Leibniz, Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter, 2014, 107–148 |
149–178 | Christoph Helmig, "Iamblichus, Proclus and Philoponus on Parts, Capacities and ousiai of the Soul and the Notion of Life", in: Klaus Corcilius and Dominik Perler (Eds.), Partitioning the Soul. Debates from Plato to Leibniz, Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter, 2014, 149–178 |
179–198 | Dominik Perler, "Ockham on Emotions in the Divided Soul", in: Klaus Corcilius and Dominik Perler (Eds.), Partitioning the Soul. Debates from Plato to Leibniz, Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter, 2014, 179–198 |
199–218 | Christopher Shields, "Virtual Presence: Psychic Mereology in Francisco Suárez", in: Klaus Corcilius and Dominik Perler (Eds.), Partitioning the Soul. Debates from Plato to Leibniz, Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter, 2014, 199–218 |
219–244 | Marleen Rozemond, "The Faces of Simplicity in Descartes’s Soul", in: Klaus Corcilius and Dominik Perler (Eds.), Partitioning the Soul. Debates from Plato to Leibniz, Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter, 2014, 219–244 |
245–270 | Stephan Schmid, "Spinoza on the Unity of Will and Intellect", in: Klaus Corcilius and Dominik Perler (Eds.), Partitioning the Soul. Debates from Plato to Leibniz, Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter, 2014, 245–270 |
271–298 | Christian Barth, "The Great Chain of Souls: Leibniz on Soul Unitarism and Soul Kinds", in: Klaus Corcilius and Dominik Perler (Eds.), Partitioning the Soul. Debates from Plato to Leibniz, Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter, 2014, 271–298 |